Egypt maintains a strict regulatory stance on cryptocurrency. Cryptoassets are not recognised as legal tender, and most crypto-related activities are prohibited under banking and financial laws. As a result, Egypt does not have a dedicated cryptocurrency tax regime. However, from a tax perspective, income—regardless of source—may still fall under existing income tax laws administered by the Egyptian Tax Authority (ETA). This creates a situation where crypto activity is largely illegal, yet any realised or unexplained income may still be taxable if identified.
Cryptocurrencies are not recognised as money, securities, or lawful digital assets in Egypt. The Central Bank of Egypt (CBE) has explicitly prohibited issuing, trading, promoting, or operating crypto platforms without a license, which is currently unavailable in practice.
Egypt’s position on crypto and taxation is derived from:
Although selling crypto is illegal in Egypt, any income or gain discovered by tax authorities may still be treated as taxable income. Egyptian tax law focuses on realised economic benefit rather than the legality of the underlying activity.
Crypto-to-crypto transactions are not legally permitted. If such activity results in identifiable gains, authorities may classify them as unexplained or other taxable income.
Crypto received through:
may be considered taxable income if converted, remitted, or otherwise used economically within Egypt.
Egyptian residents are generally taxed on income sourced in Egypt. However, foreign income—if remitted to Egypt or linked to local economic use—may be subject to scrutiny.
If crypto-related income is assessed, it may be taxed under Egypt’s progressive individual income tax rates, which range from approximately 2.5% to 25%, depending on annual income.
Companies generating taxable income linked to crypto activity—if identified—may be subject to corporate income tax, generally at a rate of 22.5%.
Egypt does not have a crypto-specific capital gains tax framework. Gains are typically taxed as income if assessed.
Taxpayers are required to declare all taxable income in their annual tax returns. Failure to disclose income—regardless of legality—may result in penalties.
The ETA has authority to investigate unexplained increases in wealth, including funds potentially linked to digital or foreign sources.
In enforcement cases, authorities may request:
Because crypto activity is illegal, losses are not recognised for tax deduction purposes. Loss offsets or carryforwards are not available.
NFTs are not formally regulated in Egypt. Any income derived from NFT sales—if detected—may be treated as taxable income, subject to legality concerns.
Airdropped tokens may be considered taxable income if they have measurable value and are converted or utilised economically.
DeFi participation is prohibited. Any income identified from DeFi protocols may be classified as illegal income and taxed accordingly.
Crypto activity in Egypt carries significant regulatory and potential criminal risk. Tax compliance does not legalise prohibited activity.
Egyptian tax enforcement focuses on unexplained income and wealth. Any substantial financial inflows may be scrutinised regardless of source.
Penalties may include back taxes, fines, interest, and potential criminal liability under banking, anti-money laundering, or tax laws. Enforcement is discretionary and case-specific.
Egypt remains a highly restrictive jurisdiction for cryptocurrency, with clear prohibitions enforced by the Central Bank. While there is no dedicated crypto tax regime, income derived from crypto may still be taxable under general income tax laws if identified. Individuals should exercise extreme caution and seek professional advice due to overlapping legal and tax risks.

Market sentiment deteriorated further into "Extreme Fear" this week (index 9), with global market cap falling below $2.3 trillion. However, capital flows and on-chain activity reveal clear structural divergence: all new stablecoin issuance came from USDC ($2.088B), indicating compliant capital is still cautiously positioning amid risk-off sentiment. Solana's daily active addresses grew against the trend, with DEX volume remaining the highest, while Aptos also showed strong user activity. Despite broader market pressure, the resilience within specific ecosystems is accumulating strength for the next market phase.

The February 5 crash was not a failure of Bitcoin's fundamentals, but a 'structural resonance' triggered by TradFi deleveraging; when Wall Street's liquidity winter met the anti-fragility of digital gold, the resulting price trough was not an end, but a gift to value investors.

The rise of USD1 is the result of the combined forces of technological progress and the wave of compliance. With its transparent reserves, compliant posture, and powerful ecosystem support, it has left a significant mark on the history of cryptocurrency.